Login |
There Can be Only One: Ubuntu Survives Pwn2Own Hacking Contest
Submitted by C.S. Magor on Sat, 03/29/2008 - 18:51.
Pwn2Own is a great opportunity to line up the latest browser incarnations against some of the world's more competent hackers and see how they perform. This year, there were some unsettling results for Mac owners. While Leopard stood up to all of the Day One challenges, on Day Two, with an easing of the restrictions, browsers were open to attack. A MacBook Pro with a fully patched Leopard went down in Day Two. It was the first machine to fall and dropped due to a browser vulnerability within Safari. Charlie Miller took the MacBook Pro with an exploit that took a mere two minutes to implement. While the specifics of the Safari exploit are unknown, we do know from it involved a link which opened a port which allowed Miller telnet access. Miller took the $10,000 prize and the machine. Vista took a little longer, it fell on the fourth hour of Day 2. Shane MaCaulay, who was part of last year's Mac takedown, had the honor. He was hampered by the release of SP1, which he had not prepared for. Four hours later and a workaround gave him control of the Fujitsu U810 laptop through a previously undisclosed Flash vulnerability. Most notable is the fact that after three days, Ubuntu was left standing. Day Three really opened up the restrictions allowing access through third party applications, regardless of this fact; no one was able to takedown Ubuntu. Is Ubuntu invulnerable? Hardly, I think this has more to do with OSX and Vista being bigger trophies. According to MacAuley, with a few hours tweaking his exploit would work on Linux and OSX. Sources: The Register, Channel Register TopicsClocks
Site News
Ubuntu
Memory
How To
Cracking
Gaming
Security
News
Announcements
Vista
Dell
Monitors
Geekinetic
Ethics
Star Wars
Technology
Notebooks
System Building
Cameras
Trouble Shooting
Software
Home theater
Keyboards
Drupal
Pets
eBay
Accessories
Art
DIY
Hardware
Design
Hacking
Computers
Crime
Videos
Geeky
Humor
Troubleshooting
Internet
|
Recent Posts
|
But unless one drank Petrus
But unless one drank Petrus replica watches every day and had a familiarity with the wine, fake watches the fake would never have been detected.That’s not an fake rolex isolated story. Burgundian producer Laurent Ponsot replicaquestioned the authenticity of 22 lots of his Domaine Ponsot wines After all the fine wine market is worth a cool S$6.8bil (RM16bil).
“ Whilst most diners
“ Whilst most diners nodded replica watches in appreciation of the great wine, fake watches one of them protested its fake rolex authenticity. He was from the estate and declared that replica rolex the wine was not what was purported on the label. breitling It was a Petrus but from a lesser vintage (that of course cost less).
Post new comment